Showing posts with label Mortlach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mortlach. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Mortlach x5 Reviews! 16 new & old, 18, 1993 Adelphi & 1988 Cadenhead's

Hi everyone,

For reasons explained here, Mortlach is awesome. A brand not without its up and downs though, having been a great (perhaps the best) Flora & Fauna, discontinued into a 50cl ultra premium (read expensive) range and now the backtrack!
Diageo actually listened. LISTENED! To us! The multitude. About a whisky. Amazing.
Anyway, since their ultra premium stuff didn’t sell very well, they’ve brought back the 16 with a vengeance. I got a chance to try it yesterday and realised I’ve got a whole flight of Mortlach’s I’ve tried recently, including the F&F. So we’ve got quite the selection today.

Mortlach 16 Flora & Fauna 43%
Colour: Amber
Body: Full
Nose: Oooooooh, Sherry, dense and rich. Slightly earthy malt, resinous oils, dry oak, raisin and fig, orange, I can't find any meatiness here, coffee beans, dark tobacco and leather. Great complex nose with some old Balvenie characteristics.
Taste: Thick, oily and resinous, a little flat here to start (very minor), great dark oak, tingling spice, dark chocolate, raisins, sweetness, syrupy Sherry, leathery and dried fig and prune and date, some orange here too.
Finish: Long length. Thick, oily and dark. More dark chocolate, resin and wood polish, antique furniture. Amazing finish.
What a loss to the whisky world! At first I thought it was all about the Sherry and little else but opens up well giving more complex notes off. Wouldn't be surprised if there's some 20+yo Mortlach in here too. Perhaps even quite a bit of it...
82/100
 
Mortlach 18 43.4%
Colour: Amber
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: Deep and heavy, Sherry influence but still fresh, red apple, meaty malt, cranberry, coriander spice, cherry, quite complex, powerful nose despite the abv. The floral geranium comes out after a bit with soft milk chocolate.
Taste: Sweet hit then nosedives in power, slowly comes back with dry oak, geranium, orange, some Sherry, malt and oils coming in later, ginger and black pepper spice.
Finish: Short/Medium length. Again lacking power here, soft florals, chocolate and some malt.
Why?! Why wasn't this bottled at 48% and in a normal bottle and reasonable price? Actually keep your crazy price, at least a higher strength… Lovely Mortlachian nose but the rest is disappointing. Opens up well though, give it time.
76/100
 
Mortlach 16 Distiller's Dram 43.4%
Colour: Light Amber
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: Fresh Sherry and meaty dense spirit. Red apple and dark chocolate, a subtle touch of sulphur- struck match, raisin, some cherry. Develops more meat! Haggis! Black pudding! Dried earth.
Taste: Soft, clean arrival, lacking power for a short moment before oily red apple comes in, raisin, meaty Sherry, malt, dark chocolate and heather into the finish.
Finish: Medium/Long length. Oily chocolate, some nice oak comes in with leather. Nicely balanced here.
Ballsy move from Diageo to bring this back out. Even better that the quality is high. Impressive.
80/100

Let’s go onto some new indies because they’re always great too!
 
Mortlach 1993 Adelphi 56%
Colour: Amber
Body: Full
Nose: Fresh blood and fresh paint! Woah. Under that there's fruit with red apple and orange. Old style Mortlach with leather, musky, expensive praline chocolates, really wonderful nose.
Taste: Sweet! Much sweeter than I was expecting. Orange, malt, cherry, chocolate, awesome meaty prune and fig, sweet oak, Sherry, expensive dark chocolate. A little too woody as it develops.
Finish: Long length. Oak and chocolate, dusty chocolate and, weirdly, wood experiment wood from unseasoned oak.
Sherry cask. Amazing nose but the late development and finish don't live up to it. Still Mortlach and Sherry don't often go wrong, although the price on this one is pretty damn high.
81/100
 
Mortlach 1988 Cadenhead's 55.1%
Colour: Amber
Body: Full
Nose: Ethereal and punchy at first nosing. Then more meaty as it gets going. Plum and apricot fresh fruit, black pepper, fried black pudding, maple cured bacon, icing sugar, the sweet and savoury notes are really well balanced and melding together. Those Canadian maple biscuits that smell woody and sweet and delicious. Resin and leather developing, develops really well actually. WOAHOHO, what the hell has happened now?! Coming back after a minute there's a white vinegar note like an over-aged white wine, also soy sauce and petrol-y fumes. AMAZING and complex and delicious. Incredible nose.
Taste: Really soft arrival, very very balanced, fresh and citrus arrival then big punchy fresh fruit, dried apricot and peach, golden raisin, thick oily malt, maple syrup, some bacon, but more savoury into the finish.
Finish: Long length. Drying, more savoury then spicy and woody, bacon and black pepper, a lasting ginger tingle.
Sherry cask, 29yo. A technically flawless whisky. Awesome and fun. And an actually reasonable price! Was lucky enough to get one of these for my birthday this year.
87/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Reviews #687-#691
Whisky Network Reviews #821-#825

Network Average: 75.1
Best Score: 94
Worst Score: 12
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and I am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and I am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Mortlach 14 Sestante (Late 70's Import) Review

Hi everyone,

Hunt down old Mortlach. If you love whisky, hunt down old Mortlach.
Perhaps its me getting soft, but its been very rare that I give a score in the 90’s. So giving my first 94 and finding another 92 on the same day was a big treat. This was the last dram I tasted in Groningen at WFNN.
Sestante was a legendary Italian bottler operating in the 80’s and 90’s with a similar reputation to Samaroli. I was dithering between two old Mortlach’s and this one was recommended to me as one of the best Mortlach’s ever bottled. Sold! I shouted (only in my head mind you), before clasping the glass like a new born baby.
 
Mortlach 14 Sestante (Late 70's Import) 57%
Colour: Amber
Body: Full
Nose: Really old school. Dried blood comes off immediately. Meaty, Sherry, heavy style with beeswax, old brass, old worn leather, very dark chocolate and some amazing dried raspberry. So many complex oils and florals underneath.
Taste: Huge but soft, amazing distillate, amazing cask. Heavy sherry, meaty, so firm, in your face but oh so balanced and long, raisin, leather, oily for days.
Finish: Long length. So oily and classy and firm. More meaty here with the dried blood making a thundering return, dark chocolate, chocolate/cocoa powder.
An import for Italy, probably distilled in the 60’s. What a stunning, stunning whisky! With some water the nose opened up a little more with these lovely medicinal notes but the taste became a little too dry and oaky.
92/100

Distillery: Mortlach
Average Score: 80.3
Distillery Ranking: 8th/ 62 places
Up/Down: 14> 8 (Up 6)

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #608
Whisky Network Review #720

Network Average: 74.6
Best Score: 94
Worst Score: 12
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and I am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and I am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Monday, 15 January 2018

Mortlach 1973 OMC (2004) Review [FIRST 93!!]

Hi everyone,

Very occasionally you find something that makes you question everything you knew about something.
When you start in that particular thing, it can be quite common to find something that wreaks havoc on your understanding and takes you to a new level. But as you go on, it happens less and less. Sometimes to the point where you think it might never get it again.

You may have noticed that I’ve been trying some pretty epic whiskies lately. The reason behind that was mainly because I wanted to explore the upper end of my grading scale.
My 100th whisky was perhaps the best I had tried and I had found nothing to surpass it almost 700 whiskies later. Either I got lucky or there was something I was missing.
Having already made a list of my highest scored whiskies, a breakthrough came when I had a calculate of the average age and strength. Apart from a few outliers, many were around 30 years old and at a strength of just over 50%abv. This almost gave me a formula for finding high scores. Just find something fitting that criteria seemed to really help exploring the upper limit.

Grading is a funny thing and personally I would never feel comfortable giving a 100/100 score. Mainly because I could never be sure there wasn’t something better out there. But only getting to 92? Was there something wrong with my grading scale because I wasn’t getting to a higher score? Was I being too harsh?
But exploring the upper limit has helped me solidify my grading I feel. More than that, it has helped me question it and myself and then solidify my understanding of what (in my mind) makes a truly magnificent whisky stand out from something that is fantastic but not quite there. It’s a thin line sometimes, but tasting some of these outstanding whiskies has restored my faith that there are higher scoring whiskies out there, its just a case of finding them (and being able to afford them).

SO, with that out the way. I went over to the collector’s stand at The Haig and had a look. Something around 30 years and around 50%. Hmmm. How about an old Mortlach? It fit the bill, but I also had a good feeling about it.
 
Mortlach 1973 Old Malt Cask (Bottled 2004) 50%
Colour: Light Amber
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: Great balance of Sherried fruit, some tropical too, some soot, old school oak, deep, complex but quite an enigma, hard to unravel but opens up slowly. Dried raspberry, some chocolate, floral- Dried flowers, tobacco, old leather, red apple, musty, dusty furniture, orange oil. Develops these amazing medicinal notes! Which actually remind me a little of that Laphroaig 30 I had recently.
Taste: Deep, intense, great balance of soft red apple, some spicy European-esque oak, gingerbread, black pepper. Develops in waves, keeps going and going. Floral, musky cologne, leather and tobacco, AMAZING zingy dried raspberry, dark chocolate. Complex spices, ginger beer, nutmeg, a little cinnamon, orange oil. Sherried-like notes too.
Finish: Long/Very Long length. Fucking great! Really long. Leathery, dark chocolate, lovely coffee and a little of that dried raspberry. AND that elusive emotional hit I long for. Bloody good stuff.
The system works! 30 years old and 50%. A massively impressive whisky. Balance, complexity and power spot on. All over, it’s just fantastic from beginning to end but the finish separates this from the 1987 Bowmore and 1983 Karuizawa that I’ve scored 92’s. After 700 whiskies, I thought maybe that 92 might be the limit. The highest score attainable, but tasting this really has opened up my understanding and given me that motivation to keep trying.
93/100

Epilogue: Not even a week later I was back in The Netherlands for the Whiskybase Gathering and tasted my second 93 (review coming up). Furthering my hope for a 94 and maybe even 95 at some point.

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #541
Whisky Network Review #636

Network Average: 74.6
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Monday, 9 October 2017

Mortlach 1994 G&M Sherry Review [From Paris with Love]

Hi everyone,

Older Sherried Mortlach. That's the dream my friends. Some the stuff is legendary and it's got a reputation for these complex meaty flavours that work so well.
So when I saw Gordon & MacPhail had one, I made a beeline for their stand.
Prices are high though and this one would set you back around £200ish. Not as ridiculous as the officials though remember.
 
Mortlach 1994 G&M Cask Strength 54.2%
Colour: Dark Amber
Body: Full
Nose: A little medicinal strangely, cough sweets, floral geranium, a little closed though. Opens up after a bit with cherry lip gloss.
Taste: Big and rolling. Quiet at first then building up with cherry, Sherry then amazing medicinal and floral notes. Cherry chocolate.
Finish: Long length. Really good. Woody, chocolatey, dark chocoalte.
Single Sherry butt. A shame that the nose didn't really open up. Perhaps it needed a little water but I was cautious at this point because a drop of water had really dumbed down a previous whisky.
82/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #458
Whisky Network Review #522

Network Average: 74.2
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Monday, 14 August 2017

Let's Talk Partial Triple Distillation: Your Guide to Springbank, Mortlach & Benrinnes

Hi everyone,

So today I’ve got another one of those random things that has really interested me and I wanted to learn more about. So, I did and then I wrote something about it. This time around it’s partial triple distillation. That magical, nonsensical redistilling of seemingly random parts of the spirit that give you the wonderful whiskies of Springbank, Mortlach and Benrinnes.
 
So let’s talk a bit about this process and try to make sense of why they do it and what effect it’ll have on the whisky. 

To try and understand partial triple distillation it may be an idea to try and get our heads round double distillation first, then triple.

A double distillation is the simplest. You have two pot stills, mainly because the distillate from one still can only produce an alcohol of about 45-50%abv and there are a lot of solids in the wash that should be separated first. You put the wash into the first still at about 8%abv and heat it, the alcoholic vapours evaporate and you get a spirit coming off at about 45-50%abv. You keep distilling and the abv drops and keeps dropping, all the way to 1%abv. At this point the wash has an abv of 0.1%abv and isn’t worth distilling any further.
What is in the collection tank is called the low wines and should be about 23%abv.
You want to distil this a second time to make it purer again and collect the parts of the spirit you want. So, you put the low wines in a second, normally slightly smaller still, and heat it up again. The alcoholic vapours rise off again, this time about 75%abv but contain a lot of Methanol but also fusel oils from the previous distillation. You let the Methanol and fusel oils leave the system in the Foreshots but you keep them because they contain a lot of alcohol.
After 5-30 minutes, the spirit is good to go and you start collecting it. This is the Heart and contains the good stuff.
Once the spirit drops below a certain abv, the Heart is finished and the Feints start. The later parts of the distillation contain ‘heavier’ oils and flavour chemicals and the later the cut to Feints, the more of these will be included. So, the tighter the cut, the lighter the spirit should be. A longer heart cut should result in a ‘heavier’ spirit. The Feints are the final part of the distillation, let say from the end of the heart 70-62%abv to 1%abv, again, at which point what’s left in the still is at 0.1%abv and isn’t worth distilling.
Still with me I hope.

The Wash & Feints still at Springbank
Triple distillation involves three stills (Duh) but can be done a bit differently, because you’ve got more cuts to play around with. For instance, Auchentoshan triple distil differently to Springbank’s Hazelburn because they want a tighter cut and a higher strength of alcohol, giving you a lighter spirit.
At Auchentoshan, the spirit from the second distillation is cut into 70-20%abv that goes into the third still, and 20-1%abv goes back into the second still. Whereas, at Springbank’s triple distilled Hazelburn, they take everything from the second distillation and put it into the third still. Auchentoshan take a very tight cut from the spirit still, giving them a final abv of just over 80%, but Hazelburn is only 72-3%abv. In general though, these triple distillation systems are reasonably simple. You have three stills, you distil the spirit three times to get a greater purity, a lighter spirit and more copper interaction.

But what if you wanted more copper interaction, but a heavier spirit? Then you get to this grey zone of partial triple distillation. It isn’t three, it isn’t two. It’s something in between.
It’s a practice that has produced Springbank, Mortlach and Benrinnes for years. Making these some of the best whiskies in the world. Ralfy’s highest score went to a Mortlach from Signatory, I think his second highest to a Springbank. Also, loads of people rave on r/Scotch about that Benrinnes 23.
These whiskies are known to age really well in the long term, especially in Sherry casks, giving you very rich, full bodied whiskies that cam keep their spirit character without getting overwhelmed by oak or Sherry. It helps that Mortlach and Benrinnes also use Worm Tub condensers.
So, what is going on here?
How do they do it?

Well, what it usually involves is distilling a part of your distillate three (or even four) times and part of it twice. Giving you something in between two and three. The problem with trying to wrap your head around it, is that every system is slightly different. Luckily for us there are only three, so let’s start with Springbank.

At Springbank there are three stills. The wash still is direct fired (more on that here) but the first distillation is normal, the wash is heated and 20-25%abv low wines is collected. Most of this low wines goes into a ‘Feints’ still, which is the second still of the three. This is distilled a second time and no cuts are taken, giving you a Feints spirit that is probably just under 30%abv. This is combined with the Foreshots and Feints of the previous distillation from the third still, making the final abv in the Feints tank 30-35%abv. They then put 80% of that spirit into the final still of the three, along with 20% of the low wines from the first distillation. This is distilled and Foreshots, Heart and Feints cuts are made as usual, giving a final abv of 71-72%.
In the industry, a distillation without cut points in normally called a blank run, and this is what Springbank are doing with their second distillation with Springbank and Hazelburn. What this means is that the spirit from that distillation hasn’t really been purified or had any of the flavour chemicals or oils separated, but it would increase copper contact and heat related reactions within that part of the spirit. Some solids are also left over in the still at the end, I believe, with a small amount of water.

This process is a little more complex for Benrinnes.
Benrinnes has six stills that work in two pairs of three. Again, there is a wash still, a ‘Feints’ stills and a spirit still. For their distillation process they take cuts from every still, this means taking what they term ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ feints from the first and second still.
The first distillation in the wash still has two cuts, essentially the first cut is a combination of the Foreshots and Heart and is termed ‘strong Feints,’ the last part of the distillation is termed the ‘weak Feints,’ but essentially… Feints.
Alright. So, the strong Feints go into the third still (the spirit still) and are distilled in that, while the weak Feints go into the Feints still. Cuts are taken from both. Again, from the Feints still, strong Feints (Foreshots + Heart) are taken forward to the third still, while the weak Feints go back into the Feints still to be redistilled. Confused yet? The third and final still (the spirit still) has four cut points; Foreshots, Heart, strong Feints and weak Feints. I know, I know but let’s keep at it. The Foreshots and strong Feints go back into the same still (the spirit still, the third one) to be redistilled. Meanwhile the heart is taken as the spirit and the weak Feints go back a stage to the second still (the Feints still). Phew This leaves us with spirit of about 67%abv. Got it?
What are you doing to my mind and why does it make a difference?
Well, this redistilling of the weak Feints in this extra still is, again, increasing the copper contact and heat based reactions. How does it differ to Springbank. I would say these effects would be enhanced by this complicated process, and also by their use of worm tub condensers.
Benrinnes started this distillation system in 1974 but stopped in 2007. Anything distilled after 2007 will have been double distilled, although I believe they have kept the worm tubs.

Well, now we get to the most complicated of all: Mortlach.
Mortlach is very special. Like Benrinnes, it has six still but one of these is very special. So special that is has a special name. The Wee Witchie. This special still does special distillation runs that are… um, special.
Instead of working in threes, the stills at Mortlach work more in pairs. One pair is separate from the other four in that it just produces double distilled spirit. The other four are the complicated ones. You have two normal wash stills, a normal spirit still and the Wee Witchie (essentially another Feints still, but much smaller than the other stills at Mortlach). The first 80% of the low wines from both the wash still distillation runs go into the normal spirit still (we’ll called that the High Wines), while the last 20% of the low wines from both wash stills goes into the Wee Witchie (I’m going to call that the Low low wines).
The High Wines that go into the spirit still are distilled as normal with a Foreshots, Heart and Feints cut with the Foreshots and Feints going back into the same still to be redistilled and the heart taken as spirit. All of that is just double distilled spirit.
Ok, fairly simply so far. The Wee Witchie meanwhile, has the Low low wines from the wash still distillations (the last 20%). This is then distilled in the Wee Witchie with no cuts taken (a blank run, you’ll remember), with only the solids removed in between. This spirit is then redistilled in the Wee Witchie a second time, again with no cuts. Then, they redistil this spirit in the Wee Witchie a third time, this final time they take Foreshots, Heart and Feints cuts, with the Foreshots and Feints going back into the next Wee Witchie distillation and the Heart taken as spirit to be mixed with the spirit from the other two spirit stills (although I wish we knew the cut points of the Wee Witchie, and the other stills). This gives you a final abv of around 71-72%.
‘What the actual fuck?’ You might be asking. Yeah, quite.
Mortlach claim that this distillation regime means that their spirit is 2.81 times distilled but I think this figure is slightly meaningless. To me, more distillations implies greater purity and a lighter spirit but Mortlach’s practice here does exactly the opposite. If anything, it isn’t even partial triple distilled, it’s partial quadruple distilled.

So, what exactly are those blank runs in the Wee Witchie doing?
Well, again remember that this unique distillation practice is only part of the picture and that there are loads of other factors, one of the main ones being that they also use worm tubs. Also remember though, because the Wee Witchie is really small and Mortlach run their stills fast and worm tubs cold, with no air rests to rejuvenate the copper (Source) it means that the copper contact from these blank runs is very little and one of the main heat based reactions is between sulphur and copper.
Well, what it seems this process does in practice is let a substantial amount of sulphury and meaty flavours into the final whisky.
Hold on, was this Mortlach or a urine sample?
Why? To be honest, I have no idea (I’m no chemist) but that seems to be the consensus and also my experience of their spirit. When I asked a friend who is a chemist, he was stumped too but did give an insight to a possibility. If the Wee Witchie is removing very small amounts of sulphur, from its small size, fast distillation and cold worm tubs, then the level of sulphur compounds may decease very little, while the volume of liquid in the charges is decreasing from successive distillations (albeit with no cuts). This may mean that the sulphur levels are staying around the same in these distillations but the concentration relative to the volume is going up. Remember that the Low low wines going into the Wee Witchie will be a much lower strength than normal low wines that would go into a normal spirit still, and therefore may contain more ‘heavier’ flavour compounds, including sulphur, from the wash. As I said, it’s a possibility. Maybe someone more technically minded can offer another explanation?

Overall, it seems that these strange distillation systems that go between two and three distillations definitely give their own style to the whisky. In particular, Springbank, Mortlach and Benrinnes all seem ‘heavier’ in character than many other malts. They also work well with intense Sherry casks and longer maturation in them. For me, as I said with direct fired stills, it’s something that isn’t going to give you the best flavours in the world getting off the still (Charles MacLean says he doesn’t like young Springbank: Source), but gives you flavours that are going to mature and oxidise over a longer time into something really wonderful.

Below is the list of those that use these partial triple distillation systems:

Partial Triple Distillation

Springbank
Mortlach
Benrinnes (1974-2007)

What do you think? Do you like Springbank (Who doesn’t?!)? Have you tried a sulphury Mortlach or Benrinnes? Do you think these partial triple distillations matter at all? Did you enjoy reading this, or did your brain explode? Let me know!!

VLOG