Wednesday, 13 September 2017

Ledaig 2004 Single Malts of Scotland Review

Hi everyone,

Another Ledaig today from the Ledaig fanboy who loves to love lady Ledaig.
Seriously though, it’s great stuff but there’s dud casks out there too. Is this one of them? Not quite but it was close to being a soapy mess I think. Luckily it has opened up a bit now and has improved.

Ledaig 2004 Single Malts of Scotland 58.1%
Colour: Straw
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: Very clean, alcohol at first. Candy floss, hard candy, some vanilla, maritime notes, clean salt and slightly soapy lemon. After a while, creamy peach, like peach yoghurt and apricot.
Water: More youthful with more candy floss and that soapy lemon. Hold on, it's getting better; interesting, some dirty smoke, singed marshmallow, yeah that’s it, burnt marshmallow from an open bonfire. After a bit, some rubber, elastic bands.
Taste: Intense, lemon and acidic, then acrid smoke and mineral with maritime notes to back it up and then coming forward, some green olive, some smoked green grapes. Oily mouthfeel. Now the bottle has opened up a bit, I’m getting more of that peach yoghurt thing again.
Water: Softer arrival, oily, maritime, salty and acidic with nice lemon juice, dirty smoke, earthy. Some marshmallow.
Finish: Short/Medium length. Lemon and sea salt.
Bottled 2016 at 12 years old. Shame that the finish is so short. I do like this one but I foolishly assumed it would be a very similar whisky to the Whisky Exchange Time series Ledaig and it isn’t.
76/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #440
Whisky Network Review #502

Network Average: 74.2
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Ardbeg Uigeadail Re-review

Hi everyone,

Another re-review coming at you from the Ardbeg stable this time. The Oog is classic and almost unbeatable in terms of value, if you like peat.
Ardbeg have been making a lot of noise recently with the brand new Oa, a ridiculously priced 21 and various Ardbeg Day editions but when I find myself trying other things from Ardbeg, I always catch myself thinking how they compare to the core stuff like the Oog. And always find them lacking, like Dark Cove.
So, at the risk of repeating myself. This is a vatting of 90%ish ex-Bourbon matured Ardbeg and 10%ish older ex-Sherry cask stuff, without an age statement. It's heavily peated, its higher strength and its very, very good.
The two other batches I've tried I've given 84 (Bottle I bought at the distillery) and 86 (taster at a tasting, see below).

Ardbeg Uigeadail 54.2%
Colour: Gold
Body: Full
Nose: Missed that smell. Classic Ardbeg of course, with the big peat smoke underlined by the elegant lifting lime juice. There's a little unami meatiness, like an outdoors grill, wood smoke, but this batch seems more mineral than others I've had before- crushed rocks, chalky, hot slate, sea salt, cracked black pepper. Dark chocolate, leather and tobacco now, wah! So good!
Taste: Soft arrival but builds quickly with lime then big BIG smoke and huge minerality, slate and chalk, that salt and lime, tequila and uni nights out, cigerette smoke, the whole combo is very sexy, tobacco, outdoors wood smoke, camping, after 10 secs in the mouth it softens with more soft minerality and smoke. Really complex and balanced.
Finish: Long length. Mouth watering now with a oily smoke and lime citrus fighting to be the last thing left over. Some chilli too! Amazing.
10/2016 Batch. Some of the best whisky you can buy with your money, despite rising prices. Quality and consistency is bang on! Well done Ardbeg.
Unfortunately it means that you'll be disappointed with other 'special' Ardbeg's, but that's a sacrifice you gotta make.
85/100

As a bonus, here's my notes for the 2015 batch I've had:
Feb/Mar 2015 batch
Nose: More malt driven nose with lots of oil, kiln and peat. Cough sweet and orange, still some meaty sulphur-y-ness. Water brings out more sulphur, vanilla fudge and toffee, more sherry, brown sugar, tobacco, coffee.
Taste: Peatier taste with a huge driven seemless building citrus smoke, tonnes of orange, tonnes of lime, cough sweets, citrus tang with a medicinal edge, building ginger spice. Bigger than the 2014. Water calms the arrival, but still a huge long development with lemon, cough sweets and lime smoke. Orange soot, which is my favourite Ardbeggian note. Long finish.
86/100

Thanks for reading!

Network Average: 74.2
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Talisker Distiller's Edition 2015 Review

Hi everyone,

Today I've got a re-review of an old favourite of mine; the distiller's edition of Talisker.
I managed to pick up a discounted, battered bottle in Tesco (for £26!) a couple of years back, bottled 2011, and it was amazing. A mate recently got the same half price deal on a newer batch and gave me a sample, let's see how it stacks up.

Talisker Distiller's Edition 2015 45.8%

Colour: E150a
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: Ah, haven't had a Talisker in ages! Perfumed smoke, black pepper and red apple. Classic combo as always. Less complex than I remember the 2011, and instead of Turkish delight it's a little soapy, some rubber too.
Taste: Soft arrival, then sweet red apple, slight citrus tang, oily then smoky with a great acidity, some lemon, black pepper, more perfumed now with a floral thing going on- geranium.
Finish: Medium/Long length. Here's the Turkish delight I was missing, along with lovely Talisker salty smoke. A little rubbery though.
Distilled 2005. Oh what a difference a few years makes. Lovely, but so many off notes that let it down.
76/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #439
Whisky Network Review #501

Network Average: 74.2
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Monday, 4 September 2017

Review #500: I bought a Barrel...

Hi everyone,

Here we are. 
500 reviews later and still going. 29th June 2015 I put up my first review on r/Scotch, but I had already been reviewing whiskies since 2013 when my girlfriend went to Canada for 2 months and I had all the time in the world to get critically obsessed with something. Luckily it was whisky and not cocaine. Since then, I’ve put everything into learning as much as I can about this amazing drink and it’s given me a job and I’ve met loads of awesome people.
So, what do I review for my 500th? A 40 year old Brora, a 1960’s Ardbeg or something even rarer? Perhaps a pre-release? So pre that it probably won’t be released for a few years? Wouldn’t that be something?
Where’s he going with this then?


Well, I put together my whisky budget for the year and blew it all at once on a barrel. I bought a barrel of whisky.
It’s an Ardmore from 2011, distilled on the summer solstice, when the stars aligned and all that jazz. It’s been maturing in a 2nd fill Bourbon barrel for 6 years so far. It was filled with 191.8 litres of spirit at 63.4%, and currently is at a strength of 59.9%.

Why did I buy a barrel? To have my own private reserve? To better understand how whisky matures by tasting it each year? Or to sell it?
Well, the idea is to bottle it in a few years’ time, and by buying a few more casks, perhaps start a very, very small whisky company. I’ll be calling it The Cove (it’s a play on my last name, also smugglers and ting), with artwork for each label done by my talented wife (You can follow her in Instagram here). At the moment, I’m on the lookout for a Ledaig because I’m a huge fanboy of it and owning a barrel of it would be a dream come true. So perhaps in 2020 I’ll have a few to release together.
How did I buy a barrel, I hear you ask? Through Whiskybroker.co.uk, and I have to say they have been fantastic with answering every question and making the whole process very easy. They have some very reasonable prices too when compared to somewhere like cask88 (although they have a much bigger selection, and if you’re looking for a barrel of 21yo Ardbeg it’s yours for a sweet 36 grand).

The problem is that I, of course, am going to be hugely biased when I tell you that my whisky is great, so I gave some whisky friends a sample. I did it cleverly though, as I have a bottle of an 11yo Ardmore from the SMWS from a 2nd fill Bourbon barrel at a similar strength. So, I gave them a sample of each and labelled them #1 and #2. Number 1 was my barrel and number 2 was the 11yo SMWS Ardmore. This is what they came back with:

Taster 1:
Sample 1: Delicious, moreish, pork stratchings.
Sample 2: Delicious too, but lacking something.
Favourite: #1

Taster 2:
Both: Really complex with a lot going on – smoky, yet creamy with caramel, oak, and even some fruit (citrus and hints of other fruits) and, of course, vanilla! I really enjoyed them both and, although, clearly from the same stable, and still quite young, I thought #2 was more balanced.
Favourite: #2

Taster 3:
Sample 1: Buttery and oily, strong peaty taste, smooth.
Sample 2: More spirity, older, some Sherry perhaps?
Favourite: #1

Of course, I was hugely pleased with this amazing feedback! Everyone loved the whisky, and two out of three said they preferred my barrel to the SMWS!
Now, onto my own notes. The first time I had it, I just poured some in a glencairn and drank it to enjoy it. I wasn’t assessing it or reviewing it at all. These notes are from my second encounter. It feels a bit strange to review my own whisky but I tried to remove my bias and just assess what’s in the glass. I also reviewed it a bit different to normal, as I wanted to try it at different strengths to see if it might be better at a lower bottling strength.

Ardmore 2011 Assessment #1- 59.9%
Distilled: 21/06/2011
Date: 26/07/2017

Colour: Straw
Viscosity: Legs- High, Bubbles (on shaking the glass)- Low
Body: Medium/Full
Nose: I can smell the new make this time. From a glencairn, just enjoying it, I didn’t get that. Clean, young smoky spirit. Like a young Laga. Smoked green apple, peaty grist, a little lemon pith. From the glencairn I got HP sauce, but can’t find it here now. BUT there is a hint of something unami, like frying oily fat?
Taste: Intense, it’s big and ALL about the mouthfeel. Very oily and viscous, really covers the mouth. Arrival is intense and soft together, smoky at first with minerality and crisp green apple, then lemon develops with more mineral smoke running through it. Apple and lemon into the finish.
Finish: Long length. Lovely long finish, the oils really clinging to the sides of the mouth. Smoky green apple, with gristy peaty…ness.
Score: High 70’s

Water (46-50%):
Nose: Younger maybe? But more fruit with the green apple dominating. A little unami again.
Taste: Soft, great arrival, then spicy! Fresh ginger, lots of it, lovely soft oak, peat, then loads of minerality with licking stony pebbles.
Finish: Medium length. More green apple again and more peat than without water.
Score: High 70’s, maybe not quite as good as at cask strength but love the minerality that comes out.

Water (<40%)- Some haze
Nose: At the NMS now as expected, sour green apple esters (Ethyl Hexanoate), fizzy water after a bit.
Taste: Thin arrival, peaty, gristy, sour, a little salty. Green apple, ginger but a bit rubbery.
Finish: Short length. Sour and bitter.
Score: Mid/Low 60’s. Loses everything I loved about it, definitely won’t be bottling at 40%.

Yep, it is young but it is also very good at the moment. Personally I think it needs another few years to reach greatness, and, really, I would want to release things that I would score in the 80’s.
The plan for this at the moment is to release it in 2020 at 9 years old. I would love to release three at the same time, focussed on the three things I really look for in a whisky: Complexity, balance and power.

Anyone else a barrel owner? Let me know!
That’s all from me for now. Sláinte!

Tuesday, 29 August 2017

Robbie's Dram & Sainsbury's Speyside Reviews

Hi everyone,

Today I’ve got very random mystery malts to review. The first is a single malt from Robbie’s Whisky Merchants in Scotland, and the other is Sainsbury’s Taste the Difference Speyside.
Both samples were generously provided by Tom. Thanks mate!
Since I have no idea which distillery either is from, I have zero waffle to give you and we’ll just get to the whiskies!

Robbie's Dram 40%
Colour: Light Gold
Body: Light
Nose: Soft and malty, barley, golden raisins, lots of pear, green apple.
Taste: Thin but soft and malty again, honey, light pear, green apple, golden raisin, some peppery spice.
Finish: Short/Medium length. Golden raisin really comes through.
From Robbie's whisky merchants. Could be Aberlour perhaps. The golden raisin notes are nice on this otherwise quite boring whisky.
66/100

Sainsbury’s Taste the Difference Speyside 40%
Colour: E150a
Body: Light/Medium
Nose: Bit of an off note- Sour, slightly feinty, rubber, green apple, a bit of yellow apple.
Taste: Thin, some feinty notes- Rubber, yellow apple, some oak.
Finish: Short length. A bit of yellow apple.
The off and feinty notes really let this one down, along with the complete lack of complexity, and made it look quite rubbish compared to the Robbie’s Dram.
60/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Reviews #436-#437
Whisky Network Reviews #498-#499

Network Average: 74.2
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Wednesday, 23 August 2017

Bernheim Original 7yo & Rittenhouse BiB Rye Reviews

Hi everyone,

I was tipped off by a mate that there was a whisky bar in Cardiff called Small Bar and that they had a decent selection (for Cardiff mind you). So, I got my ass down there and found some great whisky at very reasonable prices and a nice atmosphere. I’d tried all the whiskies before, but was very impressed they had Ledaig 1996…
So I decided to go for some Bourbon’s. First up was Rittenhouse BiB, a rye from Heaven Hill.
 
Rittenhouse Bottled in Bond Rye 50%
Colour: Bronze
Body: Medium
Nose: Lovely fragrant spices, clove, a good helping of oak, caramel apples, salted caramel, espresso. Peanut shells after a minute. There's a floral thing going on too.
Taste: Soft arrival and builds, very woody and spicy but never becomes too much. Softens again into the finish. Great caramel, salted hard toffee, coffee chocolate, pepper and clove, very slighty woody orange. Then orange chocolate and tobacco into the finish.
Finish: Short/Medium length. Really goes soft (insert erection joke here) with toffee fading fast, some oak stays.
Really liked this. This is actually the first American Whiskey I would buy with my own money. Enough complexity, good balance and at a good strength.
78/100

Bernheim Original Wheat 7 45%
Colour: Light Bronze
Body: Medium
Nose: Softly fragrant, freshly cut oak, wood sap, macadamia nuts, trail mix, floral honey.
Taste: Easy arrival but goes into very spicy territory, a bit harsh on the clove and liquorice, some black pepper, oaky tannin. I can't get behind it at all.
Finish: Medium length. The spices are staying with more clove and oak.
This was quite harsh compared to the rittenhouse bib. I would have expected the rye to be harsh and spicy and the wheater to be soft and smooth. With these two it was the other way round.
65/100

American Whiskey Reviews #27-#28
Whisky Network Reviews #496-#497

American Average: 69.5
Network Average: 74.3
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

Tuesday, 22 August 2017

Laphroaig Quarter Cask Review

Hi everyone,

How have I managed to skip this one?
So this is a very famous bottle that was a great deal at £26 from Asda. Sadly it’s not discounted much these days.
It’s a Laphroaig at a higher strength, finished in smaller quarter casks. A quarter cask is a quarter of a 500L Butt, so 125L. These smaller casks have a greater surface area to whisky ratio and therefore should mature the whisky a bit faster too.
My first taste of this was in France, at a bar, along with Bunna 12. This just about got ahead of the Bunna, which I gave 75.

Laphroaig Quarter Cask 48%
Colour: E150a
Body: Full
Nose: Sweet, smoky malt, some nut, chocolate, burnt sugar, burning twigs, wet grass, some hay, treacle toffee, savoury note- Smoked ham, mineral note- Flint, charcoal, coal.
Water: Honey and vanilla emerge, lots of cream, chocolatey malt, more fruit- Baked apple, burnt pastry (strudel), twiggy peat fires burning in the background. Herbal/perfume note lurking in there- Mint and flower pollen?
Taste: Mouth coating. Salty smoke, then savoury with smoked ham, then sweet, then back to smoky with earthy peat. Very clear evolution of flavours, great form.
Water: More soft, creamy arrival, mineral note- Flint, charcoal, coal. Then burning hay, wet grass, rich earthy peat and coal fires. Savoury salty note- Kippers and bacon. Strong malty note still here too.
Finish: Medium length. Sweet notes mingle nicely with earthy peat.
Very well put together, balanced flavours with excellent direction and pace. A real step up from the 10yo.
76/100

Thanks for reading!

Scotch Review #435
Whisky Network Review #495

Network Average: 74.3
Best Score: 92
Worst Score: 22
0-49 Terrible
50-59 Bad
60-64 Just About OK
65-69 Ok to Good
70-74 Good
75-79 Very Good
80-84 Excellent
85-89 Superb
90+ Magnificent

Full Disclosure Disclaimer: I currently work as a Brand Ambassador for Penderyn Distillery. The views expressed here are purely my own and do not reflect the views of Penderyn Distillery or The Welsh Whisky Company. I try to maintain as much objectivity as I can but feel free to take my reviews with as big a pinch of salt as you like. Furthermore, my rating scale is NOT based on a Parker type wine scoring scale or a school/college/university % or A-F grade score. You can find more on my scoring here. I apologise for any seemly low or 'bad' scores given with my system and am sorry I can't say only nice things. Please keep in mind that I am ethically compromised and am unable to produce 100% unbiased reviews.

VLOG